I want to recover money from a business client. What questions should I ask about fees and scope?

How to use this guide

Ask for a phase-based mandate with a concrete output and approval gate. Evidence review, prescription analysis, demand, negotiation, proceedings, judgment and enforcement are separate stages. The quote should identify assumptions, exclusions, external costs and who may authorise movement to the next stage instead of pricing the matter as one inevitable lawsuit.

Define the recovery instruction

A debt-recovery quote is meaningful only when the work is divided into phases. Initial evidence review, prescription advice, a demand, negotiation, proceedings, judgment and enforcement require different effort and may never all be needed. Ask what concrete output concludes each phase, what facts the estimate assumes and which event requires a new instruction rather than treating litigation as inevitable.

Separate work and fee phases

Use these questions to turn a quote into a controlled mandate:

• Ask what the first fee covers: evidence review, prescription analysis, debtor verification, strategy or a drafted demand.
• Separate fixed, hourly, capped, contingency and blended components, including the assumptions behind each estimate.
• Identify counsel, sheriff, correspondent, tracing, expert, arbitrator, travel and data costs that sit outside professional fees.
• Clarify settlement authority, approval thresholds, reporting frequency and who may incur the next phase of work.
• Ask how debtor payments, trust money, interest, recoverable costs and account reconciliations will be handled.
• Record termination rights, file transfer, unpaid work, document return and responsibility for pending deadlines.

Control authority and external costs

Record what material the estimate covers. A defined bundle and reconciled balance may support a fixed or capped first phase, while disputed facts, a counterclaim or urgent process can expand the review. Separate professional fees from counsel, sheriff, tracing, correspondent, expert, travel and other disbursements. Identify who selects external providers and the approval needed before each cost is incurred.

Link spend to the next decision

Authority controls should sit beside the price. Name the person who may approve a demand, start proceedings, accept a payment plan, compromise interest, instruct counsel or stop the matter. Ask how debtor payments and trust money will be reported and reconciled. If the mandate ends, confirm file transfer and responsibility for any live date so a fee dispute does not create a missed deadline.

Avoid an open-ended mandate

Be cautious if the proposal leaves these matters open:

• Do not treat the other party's possible costs liability as a guarantee that your full legal bill will be recovered.
• Do not assume contingency fees are available, suitable or valid without the statutory agreement requirements.
• Do not rely on uncommenced Legal Practice Act fee provisions as a current universal estimate duty.
• Do not approve open-ended litigation when a bounded review can answer the immediate recovery decision.

Record the engagement terms

Record the commercial and legal approval gates in writing:

• Request a written scope for the smallest useful first phase and its defined output.
• Ask for estimated ranges and explicit triggers that require renewed approval.
• Separate pre-litigation, merits proceedings, urgent work, judgment enforcement and appeal.
• Confirm which lawyer, candidate attorney, counsel or external provider performs each task.
• Agree how progress, spend, settlement offers and collected money will be reported.

Deeper analysis: business-debt recovery mandate

Test whether proposed pricing matches the task. A fixed amount may suit a defined file review or demand; hourly or capped work may better fit disputed facts and negotiation; a contingency arrangement requires statutory compliance and may not be available or sensible. Ask what happens if the evidence changes, the debtor defends or urgent work becomes necessary.

Separate professional fees from disbursements and external providers. Counsel, sheriff, tracing, correspondent, expert, arbitrator, travel and data costs may arise at different stages. Ask who selects and instructs them, whether an estimate is available, what approval threshold applies and how unused advances or recovered amounts are reconciled.

Make settlement and client-money authority explicit. Record who may accept a proposal, grant time, compromise interest or stop proceedings. Ask how debtor payments are received, identified and reported, and what happens to the file and live deadlines if the mandate ends. These controls matter as much as the headline rate.

Ask how the mandate changes if the debtor disputes liability, raises a counterclaim or enters business rescue or liquidation. Those events can turn a straightforward demand into document review, negotiation, insolvency work or proceedings in a different forum. The engagement should say whether each development requires a revised estimate and fresh authority. It should also identify who may approve settlement ranges, correspondent attorneys, counsel, tracing or enforcement work, because those decisions can materially alter the economics of recovery.

Related fee guidance

• Debt lawyer fee questions: Review general fee principles.
• Debt collection attorneys: Understand recovery roles.
• Business debt lawyer threshold: Decide when to escalate.
• Debt collection services: Find relevant assistance.

Limits of fee estimates and cost recovery

A fee estimate is not a guarantee of total cost, recovery or outcome, particularly when the other party's conduct expands the work. A contractual costs clause or court award may not reimburse the client's full bill. The engagement should provide change control and renewed approval, and it must not rely on uncommenced Legal Practice Act fee provisions as a current universal rule.

FAQs

Related Lexuno paths

Related articles