Loading
Loading page.
Source transparency
Court directory data and methodology
How Lexuno turns an official lower-courts workbook into a reviewed public directory without inventing missing facts.
Authority
Official source snapshot
- Publisher
- Department of Justice and Constitutional Development
- Source as of
- 2026-07-21
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-28
- Contact recheck due
- 2026-10-19
- Workbook checksum
a8b2a80755860213c4475ca363f60225cf3fa2fad066fe4cddb8eb4f52da3b5a
Publication method
What is published and what is held
Source-backed facts only
Names, types, districts, addresses, contacts, availability fields, services and hours remain tied to the reviewed workbook row and checksum.
Missing means missing
504 source rows have no hours and 75 have no service list. Lexuno does not fill those gaps with generated facts.
Conflicts stay visible
Ten reviewed Equality Court fields are marked as source conflicts instead of being published as definitive negatives.
Unsafe records stay out
Three invalid-coordinate rows and the Barkly East address conflict are held from the public projection pending source review.
Freshness
Source dates are not live guarantees
Identity and court type are treated as stable source facts. Addresses, telephone numbers, hours, services and sittings are more volatile and use a shorter recheck window. Confirm important details directly with the court before travelling or filing.