Quick answer
If both spouses want the marriage to end but have not agreed on the assets, start by separating the disagreement into individual issues. For each asset, debt or implementation question, record what is agreed, what information is missing, whether value is disputed, whether the legal treatment is unclear and what decision must be made next.
How to use this guide
Do not describe the divorce as fully uncontested merely because both spouses agree that the marriage has ended. The Department of Justice distinguishes an unopposed divorce, where there are no issues and the parties agree, from an opposed matter where they do not. Material property, debt, pension or implementation terms still need a reliable settlement route or an appropriate legal process.
The next useful step will usually be one of five things:
- Obtain missing information lawfully.
- Agree on an appropriate valuation process.
- Get advice on the legal treatment of a disputed asset or debt.
- Negotiate a specific settlement term.
- Obtain procedural advice because settlement is not presently achievable.
This guide helps you identify which step applies. It does not reproduce the full divorce process or determine what either spouse is entitled to receive.
Build an issue-state decision sheet
Create one row for every unresolved asset, liability or implementation question. Avoid a single entry such as “we have not agreed on the finances”. That description is too broad to produce a useful next action.
| Issue | Present position | Verified information | Missing or disputed point | Decision required | Next action | Owner and checkpoint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matrimonial home | Both agree it must be addressed | Title and current bond balance available | Current value and sale-versus-transfer decision | Sell, transfer or retain temporarily | Obtain an agreed valuation and lending information | Named person and review date |
| Retirement interest | Existence known | Fund name confirmed | Current information and legal treatment unclear | Whether and how it is addressed | Obtain fund information and legal advice | Named person and review date |
| Debt | Debt accepted | Latest balance available | Responsibility after divorce disputed | Allocation and payment mechanism | Prepare options for negotiation | Spouses or advisers |
| Business interest | Ownership known | Basic company records available | Value and liquidity disputed | Treatment in settlement | Define the valuation scope | Independent professional |
| Household assets | Items identified | Partial list available | Allocation not agreed | Who retains which items | Exchange marked lists | Both spouses |
The sheet is not a settlement agreement and does not decide anyone’s rights. Its purpose is to expose the exact blockage so that the next instruction is proportionate.
1. Decide whether the problem is missing information
A disagreement sometimes appears to be about entitlement when the immediate problem is that neither person is working from verified facts.
Examples include:
- an outdated home-loan balance;
- incomplete information about a pension or retirement fund;
- uncertainty about ownership of an investment;
- an unexplained debt;
- missing business records; or
- different lists of household property.
Mark the issue “facts incomplete”. Record what is missing, why it matters, who may lawfully obtain it and how it will be shared. Do not use zero as a placeholder for an unknown value because that can hide the importance of the gap.
Do not access another person’s account, device, email or confidential records without lawful authority. If documents already available to you need organising, use the divorce document preparation guide. If records may need to be preserved or traced, follow the separate financial evidence and records guide.
The next step is not yet “decide who gets the asset”. It is “complete the verified factual picture”.
2. Identify genuine valuation disputes
Knowing that an asset exists is different from agreeing on its value.
For a home, business interest, vehicle or other material asset, record:
- the proposed valuation date;
- the valuation method;
- whether an independent professional is needed;
- who will provide the instructions and information;
- how the cost will be handled; and
- what happens if the resulting values differ materially.
Avoid choosing an unsupported number simply because it makes a proposed division easier. A valuation should answer a defined question. For example, a market value may not answer every question about debt, transaction costs, liquidity or the practical ability to transfer an asset.
Classify this state as “value unresolved”, not as a general failure to settle. The output should be a defined valuation instruction, not another round of unsupported estimates.
3. Separate value from legal treatment
Some disagreements cannot be resolved by collecting another statement or valuation. The real question may be whether an item forms part of the relevant property calculation and, if so, how it should be treated.
That analysis may depend on:
- the matrimonial property regime;
- the antenuptial contract, if there is one;
- whether the accrual system applies;
- when and how an asset or liability arose;
- the legal character of a pension or retirement interest;
- the ownership structure of property or a business interest; and
- the relief that may properly be included in a settlement or sought in proceedings.
The Matrimonial Property Act regulates important consequences of matrimonial-property regimes, but an online checklist cannot classify a particular asset conclusively. The current position also cannot safely be reduced to a rule that a spouse married out of community of property without accrual has no possible redistribution remedy. The Constitutional Court’s decision in EB v ER; KG v Minister of Home Affairs, its temporary reading-in and the pending General (Family) Laws Amendment Bill make marriage date, documents and current law important. As at 25 August 2026, obtain matter-specific advice rather than relying on an old cutoff rule.
Record the precise legal question. The next action in this state is a focused legal consultation, not repeated informal bargaining based on competing assumptions.
4. Isolate the settlement choice
Once the facts, values and legal framework are sufficiently clear, identify the term that still requires agreement.
Instead of “house unresolved”, the choice may be:
- sell the property and agree on the distribution mechanism;
- transfer one spouse’s interest, subject to finance and implementation;
- retain the property temporarily under defined responsibilities;
- choose how identified debt will be serviced; or
- agree how a particular retirement or business interest should be addressed.
Compare realistic options and record their dependencies. An arrangement that sounds fair in principle may still fail if a lender, fund, registry or other third party cannot implement it as described. An agreement between spouses does not automatically release either spouse from a creditor’s rights, transfer registered land or direct a retirement fund.
For the subjects normally considered in a written settlement, use the retained guide on what should be in a divorce settlement agreement. Before signing, apply the dedicated pre-signing agreement checklist.
5. Check whether the proposed route still fits
Section 7 of the Divorce Act provides, among other things, for a court to make an order in accordance with a written agreement about maintenance or the division of assets in appropriate circumstances. That does not mean a court simply converts every informal proposal into a final order.
If material terms remain disputed, obtain advice on whether:
- further structured negotiation is realistic;
- mediation may help with suitable settlement issues;
- protective or interim advice is required;
- proceedings need to accommodate the unresolved dispute; or
- the matter can move into an unopposed route once identified issues are resolved.
The Department of Justice advises using a family-law attorney or qualified mediator where there are substantial assets, retirement interests or children. A mediator facilitates negotiation and does not decide who is legally right. The full filing and court sequence belongs in the South African divorce process guide. Your decision sheet should stop where a procedural route must be confirmed.
Use one next-step status per issue
| Status | Meaning | Immediate output |
|---|---|---|
| Facts incomplete | The parties do not share a verified factual basis | Targeted information request |
| Value unresolved | Existence is known but value is disputed or stale | Defined valuation instruction |
| Legal treatment unclear | Rights or classification require advice | Focused legal question |
| Settlement choice open | Facts are adequate but the preferred outcome differs | Written options for negotiation |
| Implementation uncertain | A proposed term depends on a third party or technical wording | Feasibility check |
| Procedure required | Settlement is not presently achievable or risk is increasing | Legal-route consultation |
This prevents one unresolved subject from obscuring everything else. Several issues may be ready for agreement even though one high-value item is not.
Keep children’s issues on a separate track
Asset disputes and arrangements for children should be tracked separately, even if housing and finances affect both in practice.
Section 6 of the Divorce Act contains safeguards concerning minor or dependent children before a divorce may be granted. The Office of the Family Advocate assists with child-focused care, contact and parenting-plan issues and may provide a report to the court. It is neutral, does not represent either spouse and does not decide how spouses should divide their assets.
Do not trade an asset concession for a child-centred arrangement. Record accommodation, care, contact and support questions in a distinct child-focused workstream.
A practical action plan
If you are unsure what to do next:
- List every unresolved asset, liability and implementation issue.
- Give each issue one status from the classification table.
- Attach only information that you hold lawfully and can verify.
- Record one next output: an information request, valuation instruction, legal question, settlement option or procedural consultation.
- Assign an owner and a realistic checkpoint.
- Escalate any urgent preservation, safety or serious financial-risk concern promptly.
If you need to decide whether the matter has moved beyond safe self-management, use the dedicated guide on when unresolved divorce assets require legal help.
Disclaimer
This article provides general South African legal information, not advice on a particular marriage, asset or court process. Property consequences may depend on the matrimonial-property regime, marriage documents, verified financial evidence and relief sought. Obtain advice from a suitably qualified South African family-law practitioner before signing an agreement, disposing of property or choosing a procedural route.
FAQs
Is the divorce still uncontested if both spouses want a divorce but disagree about assets?
Agreement that the marriage should end does not resolve the financial relief. Do not treat the matter as fully uncontested while material property or debt terms remain disputed. A lawyer can advise whether settlement remains realistic and what route fits the unresolved issues.
Should we start the divorce before every asset issue is resolved?
That is a procedural and strategic decision based on the case. Do not assume that starting immediately will force agreement or that waiting is always safer. Use the decision sheet to identify the unresolved issues and obtain advice on sequencing.
What if my spouse has not provided enough financial information?
Record each missing item precisely and use lawful disclosure or document-request mechanisms. Do not access private accounts or devices without authority. If the gap affects a material decision, obtain legal advice before accepting a final term.
Does the issue-state sheet calculate what I am entitled to receive?
No. It organises facts, disputes and next actions. Entitlement may depend on the matrimonial-property regime, marriage documents, legislation, current case law and the facts.
Does signing a proposal make the asset dispute final?
The effect of a signed document depends on its wording, status and context. Do not sign merely to keep the matter “uncontested”. Use the pre-signing checklist and obtain advice where consequences are material or unclear.
What if children’s arrangements are agreed but the assets are not?
Keep the two workstreams distinct. Child-related arrangements remain subject to the safeguards in the Divorce Act, while the financial dispute requires its own settlement or procedural route.
Related Lexuno paths
Related articles
Source notes
Legal note
This article is general legal information for South African readers. It is not legal advice. Speak to a qualified legal professional about your specific facts before taking action.