Why this situation happens

Insurance claims are often rejected because the insurer says an exclusion applies, a condition was not met, information was not disclosed, premiums were not up to date, the loss is not covered, or the evidence does not prove the claim. The policyholder may feel the decision is unfair, but the dispute must still be tied to the contract and the documents.

Legal explanation

The National Financial Ombud now deals with non-life short-term insurance complaints that previously fell under the short-term insurance ombud route. The ombud's terms of reference refer to disputes about policy claims, premiums and interpretation of policy wording, subject to jurisdiction and other requirements.

That route can be useful, but it does not replace careful preparation. A lawyer will first want to see the wording, the rejection reason and the evidence the insurer relied on.

What to do next

Ask for written reasons if you do not have them. Then mark the clauses in the policy that the insurer relies on. Make a timeline from the loss event to the rejection. Keep the claim number, assessor reports, repair quotes, photos and broker messages together.

If the insurer says you failed to disclose something, gather the proposal form, renewal documents and correspondence from before the policy started.

Costs and timeframes

Some disputes can be handled through internal complaints or ombud processes. Others need legal advice because the amount is high, litigation is threatened, or the policy issue is technical. Ask the lawyer whether the first step is a policy review, a complaint, a demand, or litigation strategy.

FAQs

Related Lexuno paths

Related articles