Quick answer
The most important retrenchment documents are the section 189(3) notice, the instruments identifying the proper consulting party, the employer's disclosed rationale, the complete consultation exchange, the proposed and applied selection criteria, every alternative-employment offer, the termination notice and the final-pay breakdown. Prioritise these over a large unsorted personnel file.
How to use this guide
Each document should answer a defined question: who had to consult, what change was contemplated, whether useful information was disclosed, what proposals were considered, how the employee was selected, when dismissal occurred and what money or remedy remains disputed. Keep originals unchanged and place missing items on a request list.
Tier one: documents that establish the legal frame
Start with the employment contract, latest amendments, job description, payslips showing the legal employer, workplace details and any transfer between entities. Add collective agreements, recognition agreements, union correspondence and representative-election records.
These materials help determine the employer, employee category and section 189 consulting hierarchy. AMCU v Royal Bafokeng Platinum shows why a collective agreement identifying a consulting party can be decisive. An employee should not assume an individual consultation right identical to the union's statutory role.
Include evidence of workforce size and the number of dismissals contemplated or made, if lawfully available. This is needed to test section 189A, not to create a headcount from rumour. Record the source and period for every figure.
Tier two: the initiating notice and proposal
The section 189(3) written notice is the anchor. Preserve the entire notice, annexures, delivery email and proof of when it was received. It should be read for the reasons, alternatives considered, employees likely to be affected, proposed selection method, timing, severance, assistance and possibility of future re-employment.
If no document bears that heading, retain the first restructuring announcement, meeting invitation, presentation and message that communicated possible job loss. Absence of a formally named notice does not permit the employee to invent one; the lawyer must assess what was actually disclosed and when.
Keep every version. Changes to rationale, numbers, structure or proposed dates may be relevant, but a later update is not automatically evidence of bad faith.
Tier three: records supporting the business explanation
Collect the precise material the employer supplied: organograms, operational presentations, financial summaries, production information, client-loss notices, technology plans or restructuring models. Do not take confidential files that were never lawfully provided.
Create a gap list for information requested but not received. Attach the written request, employer response and why the item mattered to a proposal. Section 189 consultation is meant to support joint problem-solving; the document question is whether disclosure enabled meaningful engagement, not whether the employee possesses every internal record.
Mark documents that contain estimates or projections. An employer is allowed to rely on forward-looking operational information, but the assumptions and consistency may need examination.
Tier four: the complete consultation trail
Keep meeting invitations, attendee lists, agendas, presentations, minutes, recordings obtained lawfully, written representations, employer answers and follow-up correspondence. Preserve the entire thread, including attachments and metadata where available.
For oral meetings, retain contemporaneous notes exactly as written. Add a separate dated recollection to explain context or omissions. Do not rewrite the original notes into a cleaner narrative and call them minutes.
If a union or representative participated, collect its notices, mandates, reports to members and proposals. Ask for material through the appropriate channel rather than accessing another person's account.
Tier five: alternatives and vacancies
Place each proposed alternative with the employer's response. Relevant documents can include vacancy lists, job advertisements, applications, transfer proposals, training options, reduced-hours calculations, voluntary-separation offers and temporary measures.
For a specific alternative job, keep the title, duties, location, pay, benefits, duration, reporting line, start date and response deadline. Record acceptance, rejection or unanswered questions. This detail matters because section 41 of the BCEA links statutory severance to unreasonable refusal of suitable alternative employment.
Do not describe an undefined vacancy as definitely suitable or unsuitable. The lawyer needs the actual offer and the employee's reasons.
Tier six: selection pool, criteria and scoring
Preserve the proposed criteria, consultation about them, final criteria, employee data, score sheet, moderation records and outcome. Add qualification, service-date, performance or disciplinary records only where they affected scoring.
Comparator evidence must be handled lawfully. A document showing another employee's personal information should not be circulated broadly. Identify the comparison question and let counsel use disclosure procedures where necessary.
If the employer used last-in-first-out, skills, qualifications, attendance or a mixed matrix, record how the rule defined the pool and exceptions. A neutral-sounding criterion may be disputed because of data or application, while disagreement alone does not prove unfair selection.
Tier seven: decision and termination records
Keep the provisional outcome, final selection notice, termination letter, internal appeal or grievance, last working day confirmation and proof of delivery. If employment ended without a clear letter, preserve the instruction not to return, system lockout, payroll change and subsequent explanation.
Build a date card from these records. Section 191 generally imposes a thirty-day referral period for dismissal disputes, subject to the statutory trigger and any later final decision. Do not calculate from the date the document pack was completed.
Where section 189A may apply, add facilitation documents, prescribed notices and any communications about a procedural application. The section 189A(13) Labour Court mechanism and section 189A(17) timing require specialist treatment separate from ordinary referral.
Tier eight: pay, severance and release documents
Collect salary records, notice calculation, accrued leave, severance schedule, benefits, deductions, tax material, certificate of service and unemployment forms. Compare the employer's calculation with the contract, collective terms and BCEA provisions.
A statutory minimum, enhanced package and settlement payment should be labelled separately. An agreement may combine all three and include releases or withdrawals. Keep the unsigned version and obtain advice before accepting a short deadline.
Record payment dates and bank proof, but do not assume a short payment automatically changes the dismissal-referral trigger.
Build a lawyer-ready index
Name each file with a sequence number, date, source and short description. Use folders for legal frame, notice, rationale, consultation, alternatives, selection, termination and money. The first page should list missing documents and who may hold them.
Keep native emails, audio and spreadsheets in a source folder. Convert working copies for annotation without overwriting the originals. Do not use a colleague's credentials, bypass access controls or forward customer data unrelated to the retrenchment.
The priority pack for an initial consultation can be limited to the contract, section 189 notice, latest organogram, consultation representations and answers, selection result, alternative offer, termination letter and pay schedule. The indexed remainder can follow after the lawyer identifies the disputed elements.
Ask the document questions that control the case
For each priority item, ask: What proposition does it support, is it complete, was it before the consulting parties, and what contradicts it? Then ask the lawyer which additional document could materially change advice, what should be requested, which forum can compel production and what deadline must be protected without it.
A document pack is successful when it exposes the consultation and decision sequence accurately. It should not be designed to make every page favour one side; balanced source control allows meaningful advice on fairness, route and settlement.
Important limitation
This is general South African labour-law information, not legal advice or a calculation of any person's deadline. For a retrenchment where the consultation process was unclear, employment status, collective agreements, public-sector rules, protected grounds and the exact event date can change the route. A complete bundle does not prove unfairness; the reliability and legal relevance of each record still need assessment.
FAQs
Should I send every employment document to the lawyer?
Start with a dated index and the records tied to the disputed decision, procedure, pay and remedy. Add background material when it answers a defined question.
What if I do not have the employer's policy?
Note the gap, ask for the version said to apply at the time and preserve the request. Do not rely on an undated policy found elsewhere.
Are screenshots enough?
They can be useful, but keep exports or original devices where possible and preserve dates, participants and surrounding context.
May I rewrite incomplete hearing or meeting notes?
Keep the original notes unchanged. A separate, dated recollection can explain gaps, but it should never be presented as a contemporaneous record.
Related Lexuno paths
Related articles
Source notes
- Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (consolidated)
- Code of Practice: Dismissal (2025)
- CCMA Small-scale Retrenchments Info Sheet
- CCMA Unfair Dismissal Disputes Info Sheet (2025)
- Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (consolidated)
- AMCU v Royal Bafokeng Platinum Ltd [2020] ZACC 1
- CCMA Rule 25 Information Sheet
Legal note
This article is general legal information for South African readers. It is not legal advice. Speak to a qualified legal professional about your specific facts before taking action.

